If you look at IGN articles on Natal you will find a comment on almost all of them saying 'THIS IS EYETOY 7 YEARS LATE THAT IS SLIGHTLY BETTER AND MADE BY MICROSOFT!!!!!!!!!!'.
And that has been me!!!! BUT CAN'T YOU SEE IT? IT IS A SLIGHTLY BETTER EYETOY 7 YEARS LATE MADE BY MICROSOFT!!!! And I can't believe some people are going crazy over this!!
i've been saying this since they announced it... and i know i going to come off as a fanboy here but sony is using the camera ( which is same thing as natal. pretty much) and controllers. this means more functionality in games... its all around better for gamers. natal is using the camera only which is eyetoy just better tracking. the games are not going to be much different than eyetoy though.
XBOX fanboys make fun of the Wii cuz of arm waggling, but full body waggling is apparently ok. Whatever. When Natal comes out and people love it for the first couple days, and then realize "Hey, I don't want to move my coffee table out of the room every time I want to play this game" and Natal just becomes the Wii
Natal is definitely gonna be the worst of all the motion controllers. Everyone who bought the Wii eventually got sick of just having to move their arms when playing....let alone have to set up the living room, push the couch back, and then stand around jumping, running on the spot and yelling at the TV to control stuff. Natal is the worst Idea I've ever heard...I can see why Sony didn't persue this back with the PS2
For all who are telling this dude to get his facts straight read this... "The ZCam webcam was designed to be used as a game controller LIKE the EyeToy." Yes it is not the eyetoy, just a little souped up, visually.
P.S. There is a reason Sony never pursued the ZCam tech...too much money and not worth the time...hence you get the eyetoy, much cheaper and just as efficient.
and also you need to realize that it doesnt matter if sony sold the z camera to microsoft or not. the fact of the matter is, that they couldnt have done more? ha. the skeleton on the ps2 version had better graphics than the avatar. i know its not about graphics, but i just think that its really funny.
project natal will be pretty nice whenever it comes out but to you Sony fanboys, sony has been doing this ever since they came out look at their controller hmmm looks like the super nintendo contolller with to extra shoulder buttons and dont forget rumble packs and the analog controller of the N64 so you should check your history before you bash microsoft....
you are all obviously just fan boys. who cares. if this technology was so good back then, why didnt sony jump on. youre making assumptions from one video. youre all noobs and are crying for a game on your ps3 that has replayability. yea i got uncharted. yea i beat it. and yea it was great. and that was it. youll never touch halo no matter how bad you want to and how much crap you talk about it. and the only reason why people hate on it is because they suck at it
I'm sorry but no matter what the comment this website is hard to take seriously. For one, you spelled "Natal" as "Natale." Whether you just made a spelling mistake and felt that a journalist doesn't need to review his work or you actually think Natal is spelled that way, it really hurts any professionalism that you may have had. And usually the title of an article or blog post uses capitalization.
Secondly, the Linkin Park (albeit a good band) playing in the background while the man is talking in the video is extremely annoying and even makes it hard to hear what he's saying at parts.
Sorry to sounds like a whiny bitch but I've read far too many of these so called articles with no professionalism at all. Presentation is key when trying to express your opinions, and if you want to be taken more seriously I'd suggest working on this. Consider it constructive criticism.
Other than that, yes, I agree, Natal is just a glorified Eyetoy. Any non-Xbox 360 fanboy can see that. Could it still possibly kick ass if they create some innovative and just plain fun games? Yes. But it probably won't :)
Warzonegamer fails again, first of all when this technology first came out this couldn't possibly be sold to mass market because of the price it would have costed, 5 years ago. So neither sony or microsoft would do it. Secondly it not the eyetoy ffs. This site is so full of fail. Try some real journalism.
PS3 already got Eyepet so what Natal got? NOTHING! bec it's a good for nothing tech that is just a ripoff, worst of it, there won't be any first party games coming from M$ to support it. M$ will have to rely on 3rd party developers that only praise it but does nothing with it. And THAT'S A FACT!!!
13 comments:
If you look at IGN articles on Natal you will find a comment on almost all of them saying 'THIS IS EYETOY 7 YEARS LATE THAT IS SLIGHTLY BETTER AND MADE BY MICROSOFT!!!!!!!!!!'.
And that has been me!!!!
BUT CAN'T YOU SEE IT? IT IS A SLIGHTLY BETTER EYETOY 7 YEARS LATE MADE BY MICROSOFT!!!!
And I can't believe some people are going crazy over this!!
yeah, and I bet that when this Natal thing comes out, it will overheat and turn into a brick about a month after you buy it!
Dude you got this vid way off.
This is the z-camera running on the ps2. Not the eyetoy.
The z-camera was later bought by Microsoft.
Fix this article. You are misleading people.
i've been saying this since they announced it... and i know i going to come off as a fanboy here but sony is using the camera ( which is same thing as natal. pretty much) and controllers. this means more functionality in games... its all around better for gamers. natal is using the camera only which is eyetoy just better tracking. the games are not going to be much different than eyetoy though.
XBOX fanboys make fun of the Wii cuz of arm waggling, but full body waggling is apparently ok. Whatever. When Natal comes out and people love it for the first couple days, and then realize "Hey, I don't want to move my coffee table out of the room every time I want to play this game" and Natal just becomes the Wii
Don't say I didn't warn you!
Natal is definitely gonna be the worst of all the motion controllers. Everyone who bought the Wii eventually got sick of just having to move their arms when playing....let alone have to set up the living room, push the couch back, and then stand around jumping, running on the spot and yelling at the TV to control stuff. Natal is the worst Idea I've ever heard...I can see why Sony didn't persue this back with the PS2
For all who are telling this dude to get his facts straight read this...
"The ZCam webcam was designed to be used as a game controller LIKE the EyeToy." Yes it is not the eyetoy, just a little souped up, visually.
P.S. There is a reason Sony never pursued the ZCam tech...too much money and not worth the time...hence you get the eyetoy, much cheaper and just as efficient.
and also you need to realize that it doesnt matter if sony sold the z camera to microsoft or not. the fact of the matter is, that they couldnt have done more? ha. the skeleton on the ps2 version had better graphics than the avatar. i know its not about graphics, but i just think that its really funny.
project natal will be pretty nice whenever it comes out but to you Sony fanboys, sony has been doing this ever since they came out look at their controller hmmm looks like the super nintendo contolller with to extra shoulder buttons and dont forget rumble packs and the analog controller of the N64 so you should check your history before you bash microsoft....
you are all obviously just fan boys. who cares. if this technology was so good back then, why didnt sony jump on. youre making assumptions from one video. youre all noobs and are crying for a game on your ps3 that has replayability. yea i got uncharted. yea i beat it. and yea it was great. and that was it. youll never touch halo no matter how bad you want to and how much crap you talk about it. and the only reason why people hate on it is because they suck at it
I'm sorry but no matter what the comment this website is hard to take seriously. For one, you spelled "Natal" as "Natale." Whether you just made a spelling mistake and felt that a journalist doesn't need to review his work or you actually think Natal is spelled that way, it really hurts any professionalism that you may have had. And usually the title of an article or blog post uses capitalization.
Secondly, the Linkin Park (albeit a good band) playing in the background while the man is talking in the video is extremely annoying and even makes it hard to hear what he's saying at parts.
Sorry to sounds like a whiny bitch but I've read far too many of these so called articles with no professionalism at all. Presentation is key when trying to express your opinions, and if you want to be taken more seriously I'd suggest working on this. Consider it constructive criticism.
Other than that, yes, I agree, Natal is just a glorified Eyetoy. Any non-Xbox 360 fanboy can see that. Could it still possibly kick ass if they create some innovative and just plain fun games? Yes. But it probably won't :)
Warzonegamer fails again, first of all when this technology first came out this couldn't possibly be sold to mass market because of the price it would have costed, 5 years ago.
So neither sony or microsoft would do it.
Secondly it not the eyetoy ffs.
This site is so full of fail.
Try some real journalism.
PS3 already got Eyepet so what Natal got? NOTHING! bec it's a good for nothing tech that is just a ripoff, worst of it, there won't be any first party games coming from M$ to support it. M$ will have to rely on 3rd party developers that only praise it but does nothing with it.
And THAT'S A FACT!!!
Post a Comment